Are artist collectives collaborative?
Collaboration has become a buzzword among contemporary art’s cultural bureaucrats and market operatives.
Collaboration has become a buzzword among contemporary art’s cultural bureaucrats and market operatives. This officialdom appears out of step with the non-institutional forms of collaboration suggested by the term “collectivity.” And yet artist collectives, as closed-loop systems, are antithetical to the collaborative wellness mantra we are used to hearing in the global high-end culture industry. In this world, “collectives” of cultural, corporate, and market partners collaborate with artist collectives — often awkwardly, as seen at documenta fifteen, curated by Indonesian-based ruangrupa. Without centralised curatorial power, the mega-exhibition’s bureaucratic structures were not prepared for democracy in practice, despite their virtue signalling.
Exclusive to the Magazine
Are artist collectives collaborative? by Lévi McLean is featured in full in Issue 2 of Memo magazine.
Get your hands on the print edition through our online shop or save up to 20% and get free domestic shipping with a subscription.
Related
Artistic resistance, from Ai Weiwei to Archie Moore’s kith and kin, punctures the facades of power as Australia’s art institutions wobble between defending creative freedom and capitulating to a rising culture of control.
Bridging memory work and the uncanny, Tieu’s exhibition confronts Germany’s buried xenophobia through slippery visual and sonic signifiers that elude any stable index.
Tim Burns’s art blurs fiction and reality, often staging disasters before they happen. His 1972 Ghost Train redesign eerily foreshadowed the 1979 Luna Park fire, just as his 1977 film Why Cars? uncannily prefigured 9/11. Through rupture, collision, and shock, Burns’s work remains less prophetic than provocatively attuned to history’s unfolding disasters.
